Dems Won’t Like This Answer: White House Shares Where Biden Stands on Packing the Supreme Court

The court has found itself on the receiving end of renewed frustration from Democrats after its conservative majority handed down major decisions in cases involving abortion and the Second Amendment.

However, probably much to progressives’ consternation, President Joe Bidenappears not to be going along with the push to attack the court and expand it. 

During a press gaggle on Air Force One on Saturday, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked, “Is it time, in the president’s view, to think about reforming the Court? And if so, what changes would he like to see?”

“I was asked this question yesterday, and I’ve been asked it before — and I think the president himself about expanding the Court. That is something that the president does not agree with. That is not something that he wants to do,” Jean-Pierre responded.

She noted that Biden put together a commission to expand possible reforms to the court, but added, “I don’t have anything more to share from any final decision that the president has made.”

Continue Reading

SD Gov Noem Slams Biden, Defends Closing Deadly Loophole That Allows On-Demand Abortions in People’s Homes

As abortion advocates try to find loopholes they can exploit to end the lives of the unborn, Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem on Sunday said her state has already closed one she will fight to keep that way.

And being peppered by clearly hostile questions from a mainstream media interviewer didn’t shake her resolution a bit.

Noem said that the moment the Supreme Court overruled the Roe v. Wade decision on Friday, a South Dakota law took effect that made abortion illegal in South Dakota except to save the life of a mother.

During an appearance on the CBS show “Face the Nation” Noem said South Dakota has a ban on so-called telemedicine abortions, a workaround in states where abortion is restricted by which a woman finds an online doctor or uses the phone to get an abortion pill shipped to her home.

“I brought a bill that would ban telemedicine abortions, which means a doctor off the internet or over the phone could prescribe an abortion for an individual because these are very dangerous medical procedures, a woman is five times more likely to end up in an emergency room if they’re utilizing this kind of method for an abortion. So, it’s something that should be under the supervision of a medical doctor and it is something in South Dakota that we’ve made sure happens that way,” she said.

Continue Reading

Here Are the 26 States Where Abortion will Likely Become Illegal Following Reversal of Roe v Wade

• Many states have ‘trigger bans’ – meaning abortion becomes illegal once Roe v Wade is overturned.
• 26 states total will likely ban abortion or have a near ban via the Guttmacher Institute:

1. Alabama—Pre-Roe ban, Near-total ban, State constitution bars protection
2. Arizona—Pre-Roe ban
3. Arkansas—Pre-Roe ban, Trigger ban, Near-total ban
4. Georgia—Six-week ban
5. Idaho—Trigger ban, Six-week ban
6. Iowa—Six-week ban
7. Kentucky—Trigger ban, Six-week ban
8. Louisiana—Trigger ban, Near-total ban, Six-week ban, State constitution bars protection
9. Michigan—Pre-Roe ban
10. Mississippi—Pre-Roe ban, Trigger ban, Six-week ban
11. Missouri—Trigger ban, Eight-week ban
12. North Dakota—Trigger ban, Six-week ban
13. Ohio—Six-week ban
14. Oklahoma—Pre-Roe ban, Trigger ban (effective November 1, 2021), Near-total ban, Six-week ban
15. South Carolina—Six-week ban
16. South Dakota—Trigger ban
17. Tennessee—Trigger ban, Six-week ban, State constitution bars protection
18. Texas—Pre-Roe ban, Trigger ban, Six-week ban
19. Utah—Trigger ban, Near-total ban
20. West Virginia—Pre-Roe ban, State constitution bars protection
21. Wisconsin—Pre-Roe ban
22. Wyoming—Trigger ban

An additional four states have political composition, history and other indicators—such as recent actions to limit access to abortion—that show they are likely to ban abortion as soon as possible without federal protections in place.

Florida—In 2021, the state legislature attempted to ban abortion at 20 weeks of pregnancy and an effort to adopt a Texas-style six-week ban was publicized. In April 2022, a 15-week abortion ban was enacted that is scheduled to go into effect in July.

Indiana—In the past decade, the legislature has enacted 55 abortion restrictions and bans, paving the way for a comprehensive ban.

Montana—For the first time in nearly a decade, new abortion restrictions were enacted in 2021, including restrictions on medication abortion and abortion at 20 weeks of pregnancy. (These restrictions currently cannot be enforced due to a court order.)

Nebraska—Although not one of the most prolific states on enacting abortion restrictions, it was the first to adopt a 22-week ban (in 2010), and in 2020, enacted a ban on the standard method for abortion after 15 weeks.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/26-states-abortion-will-likely-become-illegal-following-reversal-roe-v-wade/

BREAKING: VoterGA Challenges Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger’s GOP Primary Results

• VoterGA Challenges Raffensperger’s SOS Primary Results after 81 Counties Fail to Provide Public Election Certifications.
• It appeared that Georgia’s voting system added thousands of votes to Raffensperger.
• Today VoterGA announced that they were contesting the results in the recent Georgia Secretary of State primary:

VoterGA today announced a challenge for the Republican Secretary of State’s (SOS) race in Georgia’s May 24, 2022 primary election. All 159 counties are named as Defendants in the contest, that was filed in Spalding County by VoterGA’s co-founder Garland Favorito and attorney Todd Harding. Georgia law allows the same charge against multiple counties to be heard in the jurisdiction of one county. The contest alleges the Dominion vote count for the Secretary of State (SOS) race is not accurate and that incumbent SOS, Brad Raffensperger, certified unlawful results when he declared himself the winner of the primary with 52% of the vote in a four-way race including Jody Hice, T.J. Hudson and David Belle Isle.

The contest seeks to unseal the ballots to determine the accuracy of the results and alleges that all counties violated Open Records Request (ORR) law by failing to honor Mr. Favorito’s ORR for an electronic copy of the actual ballots. Actual ballots are needed to verify election results because VoterGA found the Dominion ballot images required to produce 2020 Fulton County election results were electronically altered prior to certification. VoterGA also announced that 81 counties failed to provide correct, signed certifications for the primary, including 73 that never responded to another ORR Favorito submitted to get the public certificate.

The contest cites evidence collected from a VoterGA monitoring team during a June 6 Cobb Co. hand count audit. The team monitored most Election Day ballots in the Vinings 04 precinct and found Raffensperger received about 53% of the Republican Election Day SOS votes while the Dominion voting system awarded him 68.4% of those votes. Thus, the Dominion software attributed about 15% more votes to Raffensperger’s electronic totals than the actual paper ballots seem to show. Since county tabulators are prepped centrally under the jurisdiction of the SOS office and vulnerable to a single point of attack, there is a significant risk that all tabulators statewide awarded extra votes to Raffensperger which helped him avoid an expected runoff.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/breaking-voterga-challenges-georgia-secretary-state-raffenspergers-sos-primary-results/

OUR VOTE IS A SACRED PRIVILEGE

True the Vote has partnered with Protect America now to bring citizens and sheriff’s together in an effort to bring accountability together.
Gregg is saying that by the end of July they will have around 2500 sheriffs on board.

“We’ve set up a National Election Integrity Voter Hotline to help citizens in getting information and reporting problems. The hotline will be connected to sheriffs’ offices for quick evaluation of incoming information. It will go live on August 1 2022.”

Citizens, independent journalists, anons and sheriff’s partnering together to fight
back.

Sign up here:

https://protectamerica.vote/

YOUTube channel:
https://youtu.be/aZpwp_GVwjo

Day Before J6 Committee Hearing, FBI Agents Raid Home of Trump DOJ Official Jeffrey Clark in Pre-Dawn Raid –Forced into Street in His Pajamas

Former Trump Department of Justice official Jeffrey Clark had his Virginia home raided by FBI agents early Wednesday morning where agents would not let him get dressed, instead forcing him out in the street in his pajamas while they ransacked his home. Clark, who was the former acting head of the Civil Division in 2020 and was considered by Trump to replace William Barr as Attorney General, is being investigated by the January 6 Committee and now the Justice Department for his role in President Trump’s legal efforts to stop the steal of the 2020 presidential election. Clark was the target of Today’s hearing.

Source: Day Before J6 Committee Hearing, FBI Agents Raid Home of Trump DOJ Official Jeffrey Clark in Pre-Dawn Raid –Forced into Street in His Pajamas

I’m An MD Suspended By Twitter For Tweeting A Link To A Scientific Article On COVID-19 Vaccine Lowering Sperm Counts

I am a physician currently affiliated with the Brown University Center For Primary Care and Prevention, and was an Associate Professor of Medicine and Family Medicine at The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University from 1997 until June, 2021. My CV lists my many medical and scientific accomplishments.

Among other things, as a clinical trialist and epidemiologist, I designed and completed the largest randomized, controlled trial ever conducted in chronic kidney transplant recipients.  I have 115 scholarly, peer-reviewed publications focused on epidemiology and clinical trials. I have testified as an expert witness in lawsuits pertaining to the Covid-19 pandemic—specifically on vaccine and mask mandates—while researching and writing extensively on those subjects. I recently contributed to an amicus curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court for the covid-19 vaccine mandate case NFIB v. Dept. of Labor, OSHA, et al./Ohio v. Dept. of Labor, OSHA, et al. which was cited by the Washington Post .

Until this morning, I had a very active Twitter account with a large following through which I shared scientific information, as well as my personal views.

Source: https://t.me/digitalsoldiers17/53092

Proposed Senate Bill Would Imprison SCOTUS Leakers And Impose A Fine Of $10,000

• Republican Senator Bill Cassidy will propose new legislation Thursday that would hold future Supreme Court leakers accountable with a $10,000 fine and 10 years in prison for releasing information about pending decisions.
• The move comes as a response to last month’s leaked draft opinion that appears to show the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade.

Cassidy told the Washington Examiner that if the legislation, titled the Stop Supreme Court Leakers Act of 2022, becomes law, it would not be able to imprison or fine anyone responsible for leaking the draft opinion of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

However, Cassidy did note that it could be used to confiscate any possible profits received by the person or people who leaked the draft.

Proposed Senate Bill Would Imprison SCOTUS Leakers And Impose A Fine Of $10,000

And now that project to disarm Americans just suffered a massive setback.

It didn’t happen overnight, you know.

Our infiltrating enemy was very slow, very cautious and very clever at how they went about encircling and trying to strangle the 2nd Amendment to death in this country.

Their project was decades in the making.

And now that project to disarm Americans just suffered a massive setback.

Follow Domain

To continue following my WordPress go to direct link.

I’ve created a personal domain so I can have more control on my WordPress. https://justseekthetruth.com